What goes unseen in accessible publishing: Good practice and remaining gaps

T. Gies, S. Boucherie, T. Narup, A. Wise, N. A. Giudice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Accessibility to content for all users, regardless of physical ability, is increasingly added to the agenda of priorities for academic publishers. Both anti-discrimination laws as well as the technological advances of this century have made processes around scholarly communication easier for blind and visually impaired (BVI) researchers. Information provider Elsevier recently received an international award for its advancements in accessible publishing. Honored that our progress in this area has been recognised, we also acknowledge that gaps remain in embedding accessible functionalities in the entire workflow of scholarly communication. We believe that accessibility is a convergence of quality and usability applicable to all editors and publishers, and, as such, progress in this area will benefit from an industry-wide awareness and approach to finding solutions for these gaps.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)66-69
Number of pages4
JournalEuropean Science Editing
Volume42
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Accessibility
  • BVI
  • Blind
  • Content
  • Publishing
  • Visually-impaired

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What goes unseen in accessible publishing: Good practice and remaining gaps'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this