TY - JOUR
T1 - Web Accessibility in the Portals of the Countries in the Latin American Index of Artificial Intelligence
AU - Acosta-Vargas, Patricia
AU - Acosta-Vargas, Gloria
AU - Salvador-Acosta, Bélen
AU - Jadán-Guerrero, Janio
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 IEEE.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This study assesses the web accessibility of portals from the Latin American Artificial Intelligence Index (ILIA) countries, emphasizing the digital inclusion of users with disabilities. Using the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.2) as a reference point, the study focuses on the four principles of accessibility: perceptibility, operability, comprehensibility, and robustness. The results show that 43.20 % of the sites met the (minimum) contrast requirements, and 26.48 % met the navigability W3C recommendations. Chile (ranked first, score 73.07) presented 15 contrast issues and six errors overall, demonstrating a firm adherence to accessibility. Brazil (ranked second, with a score of 69.30) showed six contrast issues and eight errors, indicating a solid performance. However, Cuba and Venezuela had significant problems, with 25 and 34 errors, respectively. In contrast, Uruguay ranked high with no errors in contrast and perceptibility, highlighting its leadership in web accessibility in the region. These findings provide valuable insights for policymakers and developers looking to improve accessibility and digital inclusion across Latin America's digital infrastructure.
AB - This study assesses the web accessibility of portals from the Latin American Artificial Intelligence Index (ILIA) countries, emphasizing the digital inclusion of users with disabilities. Using the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.2) as a reference point, the study focuses on the four principles of accessibility: perceptibility, operability, comprehensibility, and robustness. The results show that 43.20 % of the sites met the (minimum) contrast requirements, and 26.48 % met the navigability W3C recommendations. Chile (ranked first, score 73.07) presented 15 contrast issues and six errors overall, demonstrating a firm adherence to accessibility. Brazil (ranked second, with a score of 69.30) showed six contrast issues and eight errors, indicating a solid performance. However, Cuba and Venezuela had significant problems, with 25 and 34 errors, respectively. In contrast, Uruguay ranked high with no errors in contrast and perceptibility, highlighting its leadership in web accessibility in the region. These findings provide valuable insights for policymakers and developers looking to improve accessibility and digital inclusion across Latin America's digital infrastructure.
KW - ILIA
KW - Latin American artificial intelligence index
KW - WCAG 2.2
KW - digital inclusion
KW - web accessibility
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105012886723
U2 - 10.1109/ICEDEG65568.2025.11081555
DO - 10.1109/ICEDEG65568.2025.11081555
M3 - Artículo de la conferencia
AN - SCOPUS:105012886723
SN - 2573-2005
SP - 73
EP - 80
JO - International Conference on eDemocracy and eGovernment, ICEDEG
JF - International Conference on eDemocracy and eGovernment, ICEDEG
IS - 2025
T2 - 11th International Conference on eDemocracy and eGovernment, ICEDEG 2025
Y2 - 18 June 2025 through 20 June 2025
ER -