Versions and applicability of concept definitions in legal ontologies?

Szymon Klarman, Rinke Hoekstra, Marc Bron

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

In many domains concept definitions undergo change on a relatively frequent basis. Especially in law, such changes can have far reaching consequences. Existing ontology versioning techniques often do not consider that old and new definitions may need to co-exist side by side in a knowledge base, or they require non-standard language extensions. In this paper we present a description logic based representation that allows us to model and switch between varying definitions of concepts in a single OWL ontology. We show how this representation can be used to model complex versioning schemes in law.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCEUR Workshop Proceedings
Volume496
StatePublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes
Event4th OWLED Workshop on OWL: Experiences and Directions, OWLED 2008 - Washington, DC, United States
Duration: Apr 1 2008Apr 2 2008

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Versions and applicability of concept definitions in legal ontologies?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this