Projects per year
Calls have been made for improving transparency in conducting and reporting research, improving work climates, and preventing detrimental research practices. To assess attitudes and practices regarding these topics, we sent a survey to authors, reviewers, and editors. We received 3,659 (4.9%) responses out of 74,749 delivered emails. We found no significant differences between authors’, reviewers’, and editors’ attitudes towards transparency in conducting and reporting research, or towards their perceptions of work climates. Undeserved authorship was perceived by all groups as the most prevalent detrimental research practice, while fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and not citing prior relevant research, were seen as more prevalent by editors than authors or reviewers. Overall, 20% of respondents admitted sacrificing the quality of their publications for quantity, and 14% reported that funders interfered in their study design or reporting. Our results indicate that greater involvement of all stakeholders is needed to align actual practices with current recommendations.
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'Transparency in conducting and reporting research: a survey of authors, reviewers, and editors across scholarly disciplines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- 1 Finished
Malički, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Bouter, L. M. & Ter Riet, G.
09/2/17 → 09/2/19