Abstract
This article reports on a NISO Plus 2022 session that addressed what can be done to safeguard the integrity of the scholarly content being created, disseminated, and used. How much responsibility does the information community have in ensuring that the content we provide is authoritative? Preprints are a great way to make early research results available, but it is not always clear that those results are not yet thoroughly vetted. Peer review - a key element of scholarly publication - can help, but is far from foolproof. Retractions are another important tool, but most retracted research is still all too readily available.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 423-432 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Information Services and Use |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue number | 3-4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 16 2022 |
Keywords
- COVID-19
- NISO Plus 2022
- Preprints
- crowdsourcing
- open access
- open science
- retraction
- scholarly communication
- scholarly infrastructure
- trust
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The role of the information community in ensuring that information is authoritative: Strategies from NISO Plus 2022'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver