TY - JOUR
T1 - The bibliometrics profession
T2 - Evidence from two global surveys, 2020 and 2022
AU - Lancho Barrantes, Barbara S.
AU - Cox, Andrew
AU - Vanhaverbeke, Hannelore
AU - Petersohn, Sabrina
AU - Dobre, Silvia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Bibliometrics has been embedded in higher education since the 1960s and now plays a central role in research evaluation and institutional visibility. Despite its strategic importance, many practitioners enter the field without formal training. This study presents an updated version of the 2019 Bibliometrics Competencies Model, developed through an iterative, evidence-based process grounded primarily in a global survey conducted in 2020. The first survey (2020; n = 130) gathered community feedback on the original framework and informed a revised model released in 2021. A second survey (2022; n = 64) subsequently assessed awareness and use of the updated framework and identified emerging competencies. Across both surveys, a substantial proportion of respondents (76% in 2020; 72% in 2022) reported having no formal bibliometrics education, despite holding high levels of responsibility for bibliometric analyses. Respondents also reported gaps between competencies required in practice and those addressed in formal education. Overall, the findings reveal a persistent mismatch between professional demands and structured training opportunities, underscoring the need for higher education programmes to embed bibliometrics systematically within their curricula.
AB - Bibliometrics has been embedded in higher education since the 1960s and now plays a central role in research evaluation and institutional visibility. Despite its strategic importance, many practitioners enter the field without formal training. This study presents an updated version of the 2019 Bibliometrics Competencies Model, developed through an iterative, evidence-based process grounded primarily in a global survey conducted in 2020. The first survey (2020; n = 130) gathered community feedback on the original framework and informed a revised model released in 2021. A second survey (2022; n = 64) subsequently assessed awareness and use of the updated framework and identified emerging competencies. Across both surveys, a substantial proportion of respondents (76% in 2020; 72% in 2022) reported having no formal bibliometrics education, despite holding high levels of responsibility for bibliometric analyses. Respondents also reported gaps between competencies required in practice and those addressed in formal education. Overall, the findings reveal a persistent mismatch between professional demands and structured training opportunities, underscoring the need for higher education programmes to embed bibliometrics systematically within their curricula.
KW - Bibliometrics education
KW - bibliometrics training
KW - competencies in bibliometrics
KW - information schools
KW - information science
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105031928991
U2 - 10.1177/01655515261417634
DO - 10.1177/01655515261417634
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:105031928991
SN - 0165-5515
JO - Journal of Information Science
JF - Journal of Information Science
ER -