TY - JOUR
T1 - Structured peer review
T2 - implementation and checklist development
AU - Mehmani, Bahar
AU - Malički, Mario
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024, European Association of Science Editors. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - To address the low overlap between reviewer comments and the publication recommendations they make, as well as to suggest guidance on what kind of peer review report would benefit journals and editors the most, we introduced structured peer review to Elsevier journals and analyzed its effect in our June 2024 paper: peerj.com/ articles/17514/. To further promote the implementation of the structured peer review process and help reviewers prepare thorough review reports, in this paper, we present our set of structured peer review questions in a checklist format.
AB - To address the low overlap between reviewer comments and the publication recommendations they make, as well as to suggest guidance on what kind of peer review report would benefit journals and editors the most, we introduced structured peer review to Elsevier journals and analyzed its effect in our June 2024 paper: peerj.com/ articles/17514/. To further promote the implementation of the structured peer review process and help reviewers prepare thorough review reports, in this paper, we present our set of structured peer review questions in a checklist format.
KW - Peer review
KW - peer review instructions
KW - peer review quality
KW - scholarly publishing
KW - structured peer review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85212470357&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3897/ese.2024.e137675
DO - 10.3897/ese.2024.e137675
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:85212470357
SN - 0258-3127
VL - 2024
JO - European Science Editing
JF - European Science Editing
IS - 50
M1 - e137675
ER -