Scaffolding instructions to learn procedures from users

Paul Groth, Yolanda Gil

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Humans often teach procedures through tutorial instruction to other humans. For computers, learning from natural human instruction remains a challenge as it is plagued with incompleteness and ambiguity. Instructions are often given out of order and are not always consistent. Moreover, humans assume that the learner has a wealth of knowledge and skills, which computers do not always have. Our goal is to develop an electronic student that can be made increasingly capable through research to learn from human tutorial instruction. Initially, we will provide our student with human-understandable instruction that is extended with many scaffolding statements that supplement the limited initial capabilities of the student. Over time, improvements to the system are driven and quantified by the removal of scaffolding instructions that are not considered to be natural for users to provide humans. This paper describes our initial design and implementation of this system, how it learns from scaffolded instruction in two different domains, and the initial relaxations of scaffolding that the system supports.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAgents that Learn from Human Teachers - Papers from the AAAI Spring Symposium
Pages63-70
Number of pages8
StatePublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes
EventAgents that Learn from Human Teachers - Papers from the AAAI Spring Symposium - Stanford, CA, United States
Duration: Mar 23 2009Mar 25 2009

Publication series

NameAAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report
VolumeSS-09-01

Conference

ConferenceAgents that Learn from Human Teachers - Papers from the AAAI Spring Symposium
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityStanford, CA
Period03/23/0903/25/09

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Scaffolding instructions to learn procedures from users'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this