Open-access publishing: citation advantage is unproven

Andrew Plume

doi:10.1038/d41586-024-00405-0

Open-access publishing: citation advantage is unproven

Andrew Plume

Research Collaboration Unit

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Letter to the Editor.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	480
Number of pages	1
Journal	Nature
Volume	626
Issue number	7999
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00405-0
State	Published - Feb 15 2024

Keywords

Publishing

Access to Document

10.1038/d41586-024-00405-0

Cite this

@article{fa4ef6c562654ca2bb38c3688670a97f,

title = "Open-access publishing: citation advantage is unproven",

abstract = "Letter to the Editor.",

keywords = "Publishing",

author = "Andrew Plume",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Springer Nature Limited 2024.",

year = "2024",

month = feb,

day = "15",

doi = "10.1038/d41586-024-00405-0",

language = "Ingl{\'e}s",

volume = "626",

pages = "480",

journal = "Nature",

issn = "0028-0836",

number = "7999",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Open-access publishing

T2 - citation advantage is unproven

AU - Plume, Andrew

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Springer Nature Limited 2024.

PY - 2024/2/15

Y1 - 2024/2/15

N2 - Letter to the Editor.

AB - Letter to the Editor.

KW - Publishing

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85185207013

U2 - 10.1038/d41586-024-00405-0

DO - 10.1038/d41586-024-00405-0

M3 - Comentario/Debate

C2 - 38351336

AN - SCOPUS:85185207013

SN - 0028-0836

VL - 626

SP - 480

JO - Nature

JF - Nature

IS - 7999

ER -

Open-access publishing: citation advantage is unproven

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this