Measurement of Voiding Pressures on Ambulatory Monitoring: Comparison with Conventional Cystometry

R. J. WEBB; C. J. GRIFFITHS; P. D. RAMSDEN; D. E. NEAL

doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.1990.tb14687.x

Measurement of Voiding Pressures on Ambulatory Monitoring: Comparison with Conventional Cystometry

R. J. WEBB, C. J. GRIFFITHS, P. D. RAMSDEN, D. E. NEAL

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

52 Scopus citations

Abstract

Summary— A series of 20 patients underwent conventional medium fill cystometry (CMG) and ambulatory monitoring during natural bladder filling (AM). The measurement of voiding pressures by the 2 techniques was compared. The maximum subtracted detrusor contraction pressure recorded during CMG (50 ± 30 cm H₂O) was significantly less than that recorded during AM (86 ± 35 cm H₂O). Voiding pressures during natural filling are greater than those observed during conventional urodynamic studies: this finding may have important implications in the definition of bladder outflow obstruction.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	152-154
Number of pages	3
Journal	British Journal of Urology
Volume	65
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.1990.tb14687.x
State	Published - Feb 1990
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1111/j.1464-410X.1990.tb14687.x

Cite this

@article{7247c3ee0c5e456987313ff86baeb3ea,

title = "Measurement of Voiding Pressures on Ambulatory Monitoring: Comparison with Conventional Cystometry",

abstract = "Summary— A series of 20 patients underwent conventional medium fill cystometry (CMG) and ambulatory monitoring during natural bladder filling (AM). The measurement of voiding pressures by the 2 techniques was compared. The maximum subtracted detrusor contraction pressure recorded during CMG (50 ± 30 cm H2O) was significantly less than that recorded during AM (86 ± 35 cm H2O). Voiding pressures during natural filling are greater than those observed during conventional urodynamic studies: this finding may have important implications in the definition of bladder outflow obstruction.",

author = "WEBB, {R. J.} and GRIFFITHS, {C. J.} and RAMSDEN, {P. D.} and NEAL, {D. E.}",

year = "1990",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1111/j.1464-410X.1990.tb14687.x",

language = "Ingl{\'e}s",

volume = "65",

pages = "152--154",

journal = "British Journal of Urology",

issn = "0007-1331",

publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurement of Voiding Pressures on Ambulatory Monitoring

T2 - Comparison with Conventional Cystometry

AU - WEBB, R. J.

AU - GRIFFITHS, C. J.

AU - RAMSDEN, P. D.

AU - NEAL, D. E.

PY - 1990/2

Y1 - 1990/2

N2 - Summary— A series of 20 patients underwent conventional medium fill cystometry (CMG) and ambulatory monitoring during natural bladder filling (AM). The measurement of voiding pressures by the 2 techniques was compared. The maximum subtracted detrusor contraction pressure recorded during CMG (50 ± 30 cm H2O) was significantly less than that recorded during AM (86 ± 35 cm H2O). Voiding pressures during natural filling are greater than those observed during conventional urodynamic studies: this finding may have important implications in the definition of bladder outflow obstruction.

AB - Summary— A series of 20 patients underwent conventional medium fill cystometry (CMG) and ambulatory monitoring during natural bladder filling (AM). The measurement of voiding pressures by the 2 techniques was compared. The maximum subtracted detrusor contraction pressure recorded during CMG (50 ± 30 cm H2O) was significantly less than that recorded during AM (86 ± 35 cm H2O). Voiding pressures during natural filling are greater than those observed during conventional urodynamic studies: this finding may have important implications in the definition of bladder outflow obstruction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025070117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1990.tb14687.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1990.tb14687.x

M3 - Artículo de revisión

C2 - 2317646

AN - SCOPUS:0025070117

SN - 0007-1331

VL - 65

SP - 152

EP - 154

JO - British Journal of Urology

JF - British Journal of Urology

IS - 2

ER -

Measurement of Voiding Pressures on Ambulatory Monitoring: Comparison with Conventional Cystometry

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this