Is Gender a Source of Measurement Variability in the General Self-Efficacy Scale? Psychometric Analysis in Ecuadorian Adults

Alexandra Salinas-Palma, Rodrigo Moreta-Herrera, Giovanni Lascano-Arias, Marco Mena-Freire, Guido Mascialino, Lucía Almeida-Márquez, Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    To analyze whether gender is a source of variability in the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) using Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT) in a sample of Ecuadorian adults. This is an instrumental study that assesses factorial validity and Measurement Equivalence (ME) across gender using CTT, while IRT is used to estimate item discrimination [a], difficulty [b], and differential item functioning (DIF). A total of 485 adults participated, with 44.9% male and 55.1% female, aged 18 to 53 years (M = 24.29; SD = 7.61). The unifactorial structure of the GSES was confirmed and measurement invariance was established at the thresholds (scalar) level across gender. Furthermore, there are no significant differences (p <.05) in the latent means of the groups. The item parameters for [a] and [b] were found to be adequate, with no evidence of gender-based DIF in the items. The GSES is a reliable scale for use in studies involving Ecuadorian adults, and gender does not significantly affect its measurement properties.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalTrends in Psychology
    DOIs
    StateAccepted/In press - 2025

    Keywords

    • Differential item functioning
    • Gender differences
    • Gradual model response
    • Self-efficacy

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Is Gender a Source of Measurement Variability in the General Self-Efficacy Scale? Psychometric Analysis in Ecuadorian Adults'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this