TY - JOUR
T1 - Interdisciplinary and collaborative work
T2 - Framing promotion and tenure practices and policies
AU - Klein, Julie Thompson
AU - Falk-Krzesinski, Holly J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017
PY - 2017/7/1
Y1 - 2017/7/1
N2 - Interdisciplinarity and collaboration are keywords for change in the 21st century. Both, however, face challenges across the entire academic system, from administrative policies and budget formulas to disciplinary cultures of research and education. This Research Note is the first synthesis of findings from literature and models for practices and policies that recognize interdisciplinary and collaborative work in the promotion and tenure (P&T) process, brought together in a table of recommendations. Creating a culture of reward requires consistency, alignment, and comprehensiveness at all stages and levels of evaluation, from defining expectations in the initial appointment to preparing individual candidates’ dossiers to incorporating appropriate criteria. Several organizations have led the way in formulating recommendations for recognizing interdisciplinary and collaborative work. Professional societies and academic administrators at local levels are also providing leadership. Institution-wide policies are rare though do exist. More often individual units are issuing guidelines for appropriate evaluation. A number of studies have also called for widening definition of what counts for consideration, including innovative, applied, and commercial research and development. The overriding lesson to emerge is the importance of a systematic and informed approach.
AB - Interdisciplinarity and collaboration are keywords for change in the 21st century. Both, however, face challenges across the entire academic system, from administrative policies and budget formulas to disciplinary cultures of research and education. This Research Note is the first synthesis of findings from literature and models for practices and policies that recognize interdisciplinary and collaborative work in the promotion and tenure (P&T) process, brought together in a table of recommendations. Creating a culture of reward requires consistency, alignment, and comprehensiveness at all stages and levels of evaluation, from defining expectations in the initial appointment to preparing individual candidates’ dossiers to incorporating appropriate criteria. Several organizations have led the way in formulating recommendations for recognizing interdisciplinary and collaborative work. Professional societies and academic administrators at local levels are also providing leadership. Institution-wide policies are rare though do exist. More often individual units are issuing guidelines for appropriate evaluation. A number of studies have also called for widening definition of what counts for consideration, including innovative, applied, and commercial research and development. The overriding lesson to emerge is the importance of a systematic and informed approach.
KW - Collaborative and team
KW - Innovation
KW - Interdisciplinary
KW - Organizational policy and management
KW - Promotion and tenure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018757617&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.001
DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85018757617
SN - 0048-7333
VL - 46
SP - 1055
EP - 1061
JO - Research Policy
JF - Research Policy
IS - 6
ER -