Gut microbiome and major depressive disorder: insights from two-sample Mendelian randomization

Qian Zhao, Ancha Baranova, Hongbao Cao, Fuquan Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Existing evidence suggests that alterations in the gut microbiome are closely associated with major depressive disorder (MDD). We aimed to reveal the causal relationships between MDD and various microbial taxa in the gut. Methods: We used the two-sample Mendelian randomization (TSMR) to explore the bidirectional causal effects between gut microbiota and MDD. The genome-wide association studies summary results of gut microbiota were obtained from two large consortia, the MibioGen consortium and the Dutch Microbiome Project, which we analyzed separately. Results: Our TSMR analysis identified 10 gut bacterial taxa that were protective against MDD, including phylum Actinobacteria, order Clostridiales, and family Bifidobacteriaceae (OR: 0.96 ∼ 0.98). Ten taxa were associated with an increased risk of MDD, including phyla Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, class Actinobacteria, and genus Alistipes (OR: 1.01 ∼ 1.09). On the other hand, MDD may decrease the abundance of 12 taxa, including phyla Actinobacteria and Firmicutes, families Bifidobacteriaceae and Defluviitaleaceae (OR: 0.63 ∼ 0.88). MDD may increase the abundance of 8 taxa, including phylum Bacteroidetes, genera Parabacteroides, and Bacteroides (OR: 1.12 ∼ 1.43). Conclusions: Our study supports that there are mutual causal relationships between certain gut microbiota and the development of MDD suggesting that gut microbiota may be targeted in the treatment of MDD.

Original languageEnglish
Article number493
JournalBMC Psychiatry
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Brain-gut axis
  • Gut microbiome
  • GWAS
  • Major depressive disorder
  • Mendelian randomization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gut microbiome and major depressive disorder: insights from two-sample Mendelian randomization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this