Gleason drift in the NIHR Protect study

  • Jon Oxley
  • , Andrew Simpkin
  • , John Goepel
  • , Murali Varma
  • , David Griffiths
  • , Ken Grigor
  • , Nick Mayer
  • , Anne Warren
  • , Nayneeta Deshmukh
  • , Selina Bhattarai
  • , John Dormer
  • , Luke Hounsome
  • , Lukasz A. Adamczyk
  • , Christopher Metcalfe
  • , J. Athene Lane
  • , Michael Davis
  • , Jenny L. Donovan
  • , David E. Neal
  • , Freddy C. Hamdy
  • , Mary C. Robinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aims: There is increasing evidence of Gleason score (GS) drift in prostatic core biopsies during the last two decades. The ProtecT study is a randomized controlled study and provides an excellent cohort to study the effect of time, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, perineural invasion, tumour length and age on GS. Methods and results: The ProtecT study recruited men in the United Kingdom between 1999 and 2010. The Gleason scores were grouped into four categories ≤3 + 3, 3 + 4, 4 + 3 and ≥4 + 4 for analysis. Data from England between 2000 and 2012 were also available. A total of 3282 biopsies containing cancer were analysed. For each year of the ProtecT study, the odds of being diagnosed with a higher GS category increased by 4.9%. Higher GS was also associated with perineural invasion, increasing tumour length, age and PSA level. While biopsy GS from England was incomplete, it also showed a marked decrease in GS five and six tumours during the same period. Conclusion: There was GS drift from 3 + 3 to 3 + 4 with time in the ProtecT study, but there appeared to be no significant change in percentage of GS 4 + 3 or higher. This drift was less dramatic when compared to GS in the rest of England.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)438-446
Number of pages9
JournalHistopathology
Volume66
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Biopsy
  • Drift
  • Gleason
  • Prostate cancer
  • ProtecT

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gleason drift in the NIHR Protect study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this