Comparison of Long‐term Monitoring and Standard Cystometry in Chronic Retention of Urine

ROSEMARY A. STYLES, D. E. NEAL, P. D. RAMSDEN

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

Summary— Twenty‐eight men with chronic retention of urine were investigated by means of a standard medium fill cystometrogram and by long‐term monitoring of bladder pressure whilst the bladder filled naturally. Effective cystometric capacity was greater in each patient during standard cystometry (297 ± 180 ml) than during long‐term monitoring (99 ± 100 ml; p < 0.002). The incidence of detrusor instability was also greater during long‐term monitoring than during standard cystometry (p < 0.02). During filling, the detrusor pressure increased significantly both in standard cystometry (27.9 ± 22.8 cm H2 O; p < 0.002) and in long‐term monitoring (4.9 ± 6.5 cm H2 O; p < 0.002). The detrusor pressure rise during filling was significantly greater during the standard cystometrogram than during long‐term monitoring (p < 0.00). Even when the detrusor pressure rise was corrected to take account of the different cystometric capacities this difference persisted (p < 0.05). High end filling pressures are common in men with chronic retention investigated by means of a standard cystometrogram but are not observed during long‐term monitoring. Such high pressures are probably due to the unphysiological rates of filling and the large volumes of fluid instilled during standard cystometry.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)652-656
Number of pages5
JournalBritish Journal of Urology
Volume58
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1986
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Long‐term Monitoring and Standard Cystometry in Chronic Retention of Urine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this