Comparing grammar-based and robust approaches to speech understanding: A case study

Sylvia Knight, Genevieve Gorrell, Manny Rayner, David Milward, Rob Koeling, Ian Lewin

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

39 Scopus citations

Abstract

Previous work has demonstrated the success of statistical language models when enough training data is available [1], but despite that, grammar-based systems are proving the preferred choice in successful commercial systems such as HeyAnita [2], BeVocal [3] and Tellme [4], largely due to the difficulty involved in obtaining a corpus of training data. Here we trained an SLM on data obtained using a grammar-based system and compared the performance of the two systems with regards to recognition. We also parsed the output of the SLM using a robust parser and compared the accuracy of the semantic output of the systems. The SLM/robust parser showed considerable improvement on unconstrained input, and similar precision/recall (per slot value) on utterances provided by trained users.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEUROSPEECH 2001 - SCANDINAVIA - 7th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology
EditorsBorge Lindberg, Henrik Benner, Paul Dalsgaard, Zheng-Hua Tan
PublisherInternational Speech Communication Association
Pages1779-1782
Number of pages4
ISBN (Electronic)8790834100, 9788790834104
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes
Event7th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology - Scandinavia, EUROSPEECH 2001 - Aalborg, Denmark
Duration: Sep 3 2001Sep 7 2001

Publication series

NameEUROSPEECH 2001 - SCANDINAVIA - 7th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology

Conference

Conference7th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology - Scandinavia, EUROSPEECH 2001
Country/TerritoryDenmark
CityAalborg
Period09/3/0109/7/01

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing grammar-based and robust approaches to speech understanding: A case study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this