Project Details
Description
New methods for the detection & prevention of citation manipulation are being investigated in close collaboration between Elsevier and Prof. van Groenigen and colleagues at Wageningen University. It is currently being determined how best to share these methods publicly without giving away so much detail that would allow reviewers to ‘’game’’ and avoid detection.
| Status | Finished |
|---|---|
| Effective start/end date | 01/1/18 → 01/1/18 |
Fingerprint
Explore the research topics touched on by this project. These labels are generated based on the underlying awards/grants. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Research output
- 1 Conference contribution
-
When Peer Reviewers Go Rogue - Estimated Prevalence of Citation Manipulation by Reviewers Based on the Citation Patterns of 69,000 Reviewers
Baas, J. & Fennell, C., 2019, International Society for Scientometrics and Infometrics.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review
15 Link opens in a new tab Scopus citations
Press/Media
-
-
260 wetenschappers maakten mogelijk reclame voor zichzelf in andermans publicaties
09/15/19
1 Media contribution
Press/Media
-
Elsevier investigates hundreds of peer reviewers for manipulating citations
09/10/19
1 Media contribution
Press/Media